Rouse Lawyers

- The Law Firm For Business Owners and Entrepreneurs -

Call us: (07) 3648 9900

  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Private Wealth & Tax
    • Franchising
    • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning
    • Property Law
  • About
    • Our Team
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • Careers
  • Legal Guide
  • Contact

Key Changes to Insolvency Event Clauses

A recent Federal Government regime commencing on 1 July 2018 may affect the operation of insolvency clauses in contracts entered into on and from 1 July 2018.  The types of clauses that may be impacted are clauses allowing a party to terminate or change the operation of a contract if another party to that contract becomes insolvent. 

This Federal Government regime was introduced primarily under the Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Enterprise Incentives No. 2) Act 2017 (Cth), and is commonly described as the ipso facto regime (Regime).

What is an ipso facto clause?

An ipso facto clause is effectively a bankruptcy or insolvency clause whereby a party is permitted to exercise its rights to terminate a contract due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party.

How are insolvency clauses affected?

The ipso facto regime changes the functionality of insolvency clauses in contracts by placing a stay on a party’s right to terminate or change the operation of the contract, unless excepted.  That means that any action that can be taken by a party against another party (ie such as the right of one party to terminate the contract in the event of the insolvency of the other party) would be put on hold, unless an exception applies.

Notably, under the Regime, while a stay is in place on an ipso facto clause, the company the subject of an insolvency event may not exercise any right it may have under the contract to request an advance of money or to request credit from the other party.

What types of insolvency events are affected?

The following are examples of the types of insolvency events we have seen in contracts to which the Regime applies:

  • Company Arrangement – an arrangement between a company and the creditors of that company (for the purpose of avoiding being wound up) that is put in place to determine how the company’s affairs will be dealt with;
  • Receivership – in the event a controller or manager is appointed in respect of all or part of a company’s assets; and
  • Administration – in the event a company is taken under the management of an appointed administrator.

How long does a stay on an ipso facto clause last?

The stay period commences when:

  • Company Arrangement – an application for a company arrangement is made (or, for a company, being the disclosing entity, an announcement relating to a company arrangement is made);
  • Receivership – a controller or manager is appointed in relation to a receivership; or
  • Administration – when a company is placed into administration.

The end of the stay period varies and is not clear.  Subject to extensions, the stay on an ipso facto clause may end:

  • Company Arrangement – when the application for company arrangement is withdrawn (or when it is dismissed by a Court), when the company arrangement comes to an end (unless there is a resolution to wind up the company, in which case the stay period ends when the company is wound up) or, if a company (that is a disclosing entity) has announced that it will make application for company arrangement and does not make that application within three months of the announcement, then three months after the announcement is made;
  • Receivership – the control or the appointment of a controller and manager of the company’s assets ends; or
  • Administration – when the administration of the company ends.

The stay period may be extended by order of a Court and may therefore continue indefinitely where, for example:

  • a stay has been lifted before the end of the stay period because the reason for enforcing the right relates to the company’s financial position; or
  • before the company’s commencement of company arrangement, administration or receivership.

What are the exceptions?

The ipso facto regime excludes a wide range of contracts. The following list of contracts, (amongst others) are excluded from the ipso facto stay provisions:

  • Arrangements relating to the sale of a business
  • Arrangements in relation to the management of financial investments
  • Arrangements relating to escrow accounts containing code and/or passwords for the operation of software (for access by the licensee in the event the licensor is subject to an insolvency event)
  • Agreements, approvals and permits issued by the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a local government
  • Agreements for the supply of goods or services to a public hospital or health service
  • Agreements directly connected with a securities financing transaction
  • Agreements or arrangements entered into on or after 1 July 2018 but before 1 July 2023 that is a novation or assignment of some or all rights under an agreement, or a variation of an agreement.

Court may order a lift of the stay

A Court may make an order that a stay does not apply to any specific part of an ipso facto clause or, alternatively, to the whole of ipso facto clause.  The Court may also order the lifting of the stay for a company arrangement if the Court is satisfied that the application was not made for the purpose of avoiding the winding up of the company.

For each company arrangement, receivership and administration, the Court may order that the stay does not apply if the Court is satisfied that it is appropriate in the interests of justice.  How the Court determines what is not in the interests of justice in respect of a company arrangement, receivership or administration is not entirely clear.

What Should You Do?

You should review your existing contracts and agreements to see whether they are captured by the ipso facto stay provisions or whether they are exempt. If you intend to rely on an exception, please be aware that the wording of the exception is open to interpretation and there has not been any real guidance or decisions from the court at this stage. Given the uncertainty in this area, we recommend you seek advice before taking any action.

September 13, 2018 Filed Under: News and Articles

ENQUIRE NOW

Enter your details below to get in touch with a legal professional and find out how Rouse Lawyers can help

We add new contacts to Rouse Lawyers database. We may send you information or service offerings we believe may be relevant to you. If you agree to being contacted by us in the future, send your enquiry. Naturally, you can unsubscribe any time.

Client Reviews

"Their knowledge of franchising is comprehensive"

“I have tried several of the larger law firms at the big end of town but found their services to be quite bland and predictable. Rouse Lawyers’s style of operation suits me much better, their knowledge of franchising is comprehensive, and just as importantly, their thinking is distinctly street wise and entrepreneurial.”

Ross ClaytonThe Vast Interior, Head Franchisor

"We highly recommend Matthew Rouse of Rouse Lawyers"

We engaged the services of Matthew Rouse of Rouse Lawyers for the sale of our Medical business. We understood this process could be long, stressful & complicated as it indeed turned out to be. Matthew handled the process with great care, patience & diligence & he helped to drive the negotiations forward culminating in a successful outcome. Matthew was always available for comment & advice & his unflappable nature was of great reassurance to us. We highly recommend Matthew Rouse of Rouse Lawyers.

Ailbhe & Frank Cunningham

"We consider Rouse part of our team, and highly recommend them"

“Given the nature and size of our clients, we are constantly dealing with the big end of town when it comes to law firms. Matthew’s strategic advice has been utilised in negotiating software development agreements for our 3D interactive rendering engine, structuring our IP, employment matters, recoveries and corporate advice. We consider Rouse part of our team, and highly recommend them as a commercial law firm.”

Ben PowellRoam Interactive

PRIVACY POLICY DISCLAIMER TERMS

BRISBANE OFFICE

Ph: +61 7 3648 9900

Fx: +61 7 3648 9911

Level 2, 22 Wandoo St, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006

17-Page Guide Reveals:

How To Protect Your Business and Your Assets While Allowing Your Business To Thrive

Written by Matthew Rouse, commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers.

17-Page Guide Reveals:

How To Protect Your Business and Your Assets While Allowing Your Business To Thrive

Written by Matthew Rouse, commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers.

Sign Up To Our Newsletter