Rouse Lawyers

- The Law Firm For Business Owners and Entrepreneurs -

Call us: (07) 3648 9900

  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Private Wealth & Tax
    • Franchising
    • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning
    • Property Law
  • About
    • Our Team
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • Careers
  • Legal Guide
  • Contact

What Does Without Prejudice Mean?

There may be no other legal phrase that is more misunderstood and abused, by bush and city lawyers alike, than the phrase “without prejudice”.

Even where no dispute being resolved, it is not unusual to see emails or letters garnished with the words “without prejudice”, sometimes in all-caps or even underlined and in bold for good measure.

Without Prejudice: 5 Common Misconceptions

  1. The phrase must be written in capitals and marked to stand-out (e.g. WITHOUT PREJUDICE), otherwise it won’t apply.
  2. If writing a letter of demand, you should mark the letter Without Prejudice even though you’re not making any concessions or reducing the debt.
  3. If sending a letter to try and finalise a contract (e.g. sale of a business) through genuine negotiation or compromise, you should mark the letter Without Prejudice even though the contract is not a settlement of a dispute.
  4. Once your email or letter is marked Without Prejudice, then that correspondence is protected and cannot be used against you in the court of law.
  5. Even if you mark a letter Without Prejudice, you can choose whether to refer to that letter in subsequent court proceedings as it is your letter.

Without Prejudice Letter: What is It?

The “without prejudice” privilege applies to letters (paper or electronic) and verbal communications made in the course of genuine attempts to negotiate a settlement in a civil dispute.

The without prejudice letter or verbal communication must be a valid and genuine negotiation between parties with an intention to settle a dispute.

If negotiations fail, the without prejudice letter cannot be used in any subsequent court proceedings without the consent of both parties.

Without prejudice is a joint privilege that protects equally the maker and the recipient of the letter and cannot be waived unilaterally.

What is the Effect of the Without Prejudice Privilege?

The purpose of the rule is to facilitate communication between parties in a dispute to help them avoid litigation.

The privilege protects parties so that they can make settlement offers in the context of a dispute without fear that the content of their settlement negotiations will be used as evidence (or some admission of liability) against them.

When a letter or document is made on a without prejudice basis, it generally cannot be entered into evidence except in limited circumstances discussed below.

Without Prejudice Letter and Substance Over Form

The test to determine what is protected is a matter of what’s known in law as substance over form. The simple fact that a letter is marked “without prejudice” does not mean it necessarily attracts the privilege.

There is no strict legal requirement that a person sending a without prejudice letter actually specify that they are speaking or writing on a without prejudice basis.

Whether the privilege applies will be determined by the substance of the communication.

If you want to make a without prejudice offer or hold a conversation in the context of a dispute, the best practice is to communicate clearly that you wish to do so on a without prejudice basis.

In the interests of clarity, you should use the term “without prejudice” and explain its meaning if required.

Other phrases, such as “off the record” should be avoided as they have no defined legal meaning and will be open to interpretation by a court.

Main Exception to the Without Prejudice Rule

Any communication made on a without prejudice basis may still be referred to a court if relevant to determine liability for costs in a proceeding. This explains why the phrase is sometimes expanded to “Without Prejudice Save as to Costs”.

This might be relevant if the without prejudice communications show that one party has acted unreasonably in the course of the proceeding or has pursued litigation for a collateral purpose that is unrelated to the enforcement of their rights or the determination of a genuine dispute.

In that case, although the communications cannot be entered in as evidence on the actual matter in dispute, they may be admitted when the court or tribunal determines which party should bear the costs of the proceeding.

Aside from the issue of costs, there are many other exceptions that are contained in section 131(2) of the Uniform Evidence Acts, including:

  • a dispute regarding the terms of a concluded settlement;
  • a misrepresentation contrary to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth); or
  • perjury, blackmail or other unambiguous impropriety.

Takeaway

Unless it is made in an effort to settle a dispute, a communication will not be protected by having the words Without Prejudice used.

Whether it is marked “without prejudice” or not, a communication that is connected to the settlement of a dispute is generally protected and cannot be used against either party.

Have a Question About Litigation? Ask a Lawyer

August 3, 2016 Filed Under: Corporate & Commercial

Enter your details below to contact a professional Corporate & Commercial lawyer.

↓

We add new contacts to Rouse Lawyers database. We may send you information or service offerings we believe may be relevant to you. If you agree to being contacted by us in the future, send your enquiry. Naturally, you can unsubscribe any time.

Client Reviews

"Smooth, affordable and manageable"

“We recently engaged Rouse Lawyers to assist us in purchasing our first home. The support we received from Jesse Mason and his team was invaluable, easing the overwhelming emotions of being first time homebuyers. He supported us to understand both the land and home contracts, walking us through the process and promptly responding to any concerns, which made the whole process smooth, affordable and manageable”.

Nick JohnstonHitachi Construction Machinery (Australia) Pty Ltd

"I would highly recommend Ben and the Rouse Lawyers team"

We are expanding our growing business into new areas. Ben Thorn took the time to understand our needs and delivered timely and expert advice. In addition to his coverage of the commercial transactions, Ben guided us through each step of the process of registering our trade mark. I would highly recommend Ben and the Rouse Lawyers team.

Jon MailerProtrade United

"We call upon Rouse Lawyers for their invaluable advice"

We have used Rouse Lawyers over the past 3 years, predominantly in our mergers and acquisitions activities. Matthew and his team understand the needs of larger family businesses, and their pragmatic and commercial approach to transactions is first class. From personal matters to large deals, we call upon Rouse Lawyers for their invaluable advice.

Tom FalkensteinTotal Records Management

PRIVACY POLICY DISCLAIMER TERMS

BRISBANE OFFICE

Ph: +61 7 3648 9900

Fx: +61 7 3648 9911

Level 2, 22 Wandoo St, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006

17-Page Guide Reveals:

How To Protect Your Business and Your Assets While Allowing Your Business To Thrive

Written by Matthew Rouse, commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers.

17-Page Guide Reveals:

How To Protect Your Business and Your Assets While Allowing Your Business To Thrive

Written by Matthew Rouse, commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers.

Sign Up To Our Newsletter