Rouse Lawyers

- The Law Firm For Business Owners and Entrepreneurs -

Call us: (07) 3648 9900

  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Private Wealth & Tax
    • Franchising
    • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning
    • Property Law
  • About
    • Our Team
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • Careers
  • Legal Guide
  • Contact

Rouse Lawyers’ success for subcontractors against insolvent building giant Walton Construction

Matthew Rouse

The collapse of Walton Construction (Qld) Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Walton) in late 2013 left many subcontractors unpaid and out of pocket. Rouse Lawyers acted for two such subcontractors, Biondic Investments Pty Ltd (Biondic) and Costall Drainage Pty Ltd (Costall), with outstanding invoices to Walton in the order of over $700,000.

Subcontractors’ Charges Act

The Subcontractors’ Charges Act 1974 (Qld) (the Act) applies where building, construction or civil work is carried out on land in Queensland by a subcontractor (generally for a head contractor).

The Act allows a subcontractor to claim a charge on money payable to a head contractor by a principal (eg. a landowner), where the subcontractor performs work on land for the head contractor.

A charge can secure payment of money that is payable to the subcontractor for work done by it under a subcontract. It effectively directs the principal not to pay the head contractor, and allows the subcontractor to access those unpaid monies directly, ahead of the head contractor.

Enforcement Proceedings

If a subcontractor serves a valid charge for the money owed under the subcontract, and payment is not made to the subcontractor, the subcontractor is able to commence proceedings in a court to enforce the charge.
Once a charge is served, proceedings must be commenced within 1 month, unless a charge is in respect of retention money only (in which case the time period is extended to 4 months).

Rouse Lawyers prepared and issued charges for Biondic and Costall, and subsequently commenced enforcement proceedings in the District Court when payment was not made. This enabled the subcontractors to bypass the insolvent head contractor (Walton), and secure the monies payable to Walton by the principal, Hydrox Nominees Pty Ltd (Hydrox).

A principal may at any stage pay into court the amount claimed in the notice of claim of charge – and this is what Hydrox did. This payment discharged the principal from any further liability for the amount paid and of the costs of any proceeding for the amount paid.

Outcome

Unfortunately there were insufficient monies payable by Hydrox to Walton to fully compensate Biondic and Costall, however both companies received over 60% of the monies owed to them by Walton, in circumstances where the forecast for other creditors for Walton was, and remains, extremely grim.

Takeaway

It is vital that subcontractors act quickly to issue a notice of claim of charge to secure monies that are not yet paid by the principal to the head contractor.

January 31, 2014 Filed Under: Commercial Litigation, Property

Enter your details below to contact a professional Commercial Litigation lawyer.

↓

We add new contacts to Rouse Lawyers database. We may send you information or service offerings we believe may be relevant to you. If you agree to being contacted by us in the future, send your enquiry. Naturally, you can unsubscribe any time.

Client Reviews

"We consider Rouse part of our team, and highly recommend them"

“Given the nature and size of our clients, we are constantly dealing with the big end of town when it comes to law firms. Matthew’s strategic advice has been utilised in negotiating software development agreements for our 3D interactive rendering engine, structuring our IP, employment matters, recoveries and corporate advice. We consider Rouse part of our team, and highly recommend them as a commercial law firm.”

Ben PowellRoam Interactive

"Their knowledge of franchising is comprehensive"

“I have tried several of the larger law firms at the big end of town but found their services to be quite bland and predictable. Rouse Lawyers’s style of operation suits me much better, their knowledge of franchising is comprehensive, and just as importantly, their thinking is distinctly street wise and entrepreneurial.”

Ross ClaytonThe Vast Interior, Head Franchisor

“Rouse Lawyers were across all the issues and I felt very secure”

“When seeking a Trademark registration for DanDaLion Friends it was important to get the detail exactly right. Rouse Lawyers were across all the issues and I felt very secure with their advice in what can be a potentially difficult area. Thanks to the team for delivering peace of mind so brilliantly.”

Laury BrayDandalion Friends

PRIVACY POLICY DISCLAIMER TERMS

BRISBANE OFFICE

Ph: +61 7 3648 9900

Fx: +61 7 3648 9911

Level 2, 22 Wandoo St, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006

17-Page Guide Reveals:

How To Protect Your Business and Your Assets While Allowing Your Business To Thrive

Written by Matthew Rouse, commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers.

17-Page Guide Reveals:

How To Protect Your Business and Your Assets While Allowing Your Business To Thrive

Written by Matthew Rouse, commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers.

Sign Up To Our Newsletter